Simulation of single-effect and triple-effect evaporator for fruit juice concentration using Aspen HYSYS
Khalid Hameed, Anees A. Khadom, Hameed B. Mahood
University of Baghdad University of Diyala University of Kerbala University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
One of the most popular methods of fruit juice preservation is concentration since it offers a variety of advantages, like decreased volume, weight, packing, simpler transportation and handling, and a longer shelf life. The present paper studied the evaporation of fruit juice in single- and triple-effect evaporators using Aspen HYSYS software. The amount of juice was 3000 kg/h, and its concentration was raised from 10 to 50 °Brix. Four evaporator layouts were estimated and optimized: single-effect, modified single-effect, forward triple-effect, and triple-effect in parallel. It is a study of the effect of the temperature of saturated steam (120–300 °C) used to concentrate the juice and the pressure of the product (15–50 kPa) on the mass flow rate of steam required, economy, and overall heat transfer coefficient times area (UA) of the evaporator. The best operating conditions for each type of evaporation system were 15 kPa of the product’s pressure for all types of evaporators, 192, 240, 182, and 210 °C of the single-effect, modified single-effect, forward triple-effect, and parallel triple-effect, respectively. These operating conditions are equivalent to the steam required, economy, UA, and steam cost as follows: for each type, they were (3075, 338.4, 1224, and 1100 kg/h), (0.78, 7.1, 1.96, and 2.15), (40,182, 74,505, 539,987, 152,173 kJ/°C h), and (12.68 × 10 3 , 12.76 × 10 3 , 12.65 × 10 3 , and 12.73 × 10 3 $/h), respectively.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Process Optimization and Integration
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
参考文献 20
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条