Design and analysis of a cotter joint using finite element analysis
Farah Kamil, Maher Rehaif Khudhair, Hameedah Sahib Hasan
Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Given the demands of contemporary technology, as well as the complexity and diversity of manufacturing due to the quick updates of products, the traditional design of cotter joints has become inappropriate. One useful tool in this regard is computer-aided design (CAD) of cotter joints. Initially, finite element analysis showed great promise in simulating several mechanical applications. Finite element analysis can reduce the number of physical prototypes and experiments produced while optimizing each component throughout the design process. This study aims to design and analyze a new cotter joint to prevent failure in standard cotter joints due to the concentration of stresses in them. Then, the mechanical properties of the joints are determined using the integration between SOLIDWORKS software (version 2020) and ANSYS software (version R22). The deflections, von Mises, and shear stress values in joint elements are computed via the finite element technique. Finite element analysis evaluated the proposed cotter joint and was validated through strength verification. The proposed joint exhibited improved structural reliability. The factor of safety for tensile increased from 1.18 to 1.38, the factor of safety for shear from 1.36 to 1.93, and the factor of safety for bearing from 1.50 to 1.88, respectively. In addition, the margins of safety have increased from 0.18, 0.36, and 0.50 to 0.38, 0.93, and 0.88, respectively, which shows the improvement in load-carrying capacity and decrease in the risk of failure in case of axial loading. The results show that the proposed cotter joint has better structural safety and load-carrying performance with higher factors of safety and margins of safety as compared to the conventional design, which makes it more suitable for high-load engineering applications.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
Engineering Applied Research · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
参考文献 21
此处列出前 3 条