HOW DO DIFFERENT MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY PERFORM?
Owen L. Petchey, Andy Hector, Kevin J. Gaston
University of Sheffield Natural Environment Research Council University of Zurich Imperial College London
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Biodiversity can influence ecosystem functioning through changes in the amount of resource use complementary among species. Functional diversity is a measure of biodiversity that aims to quantify resource use complementarity and thereby explain and predict ecosystem functioning. The primary goal of this article is to compare the explanatory power of four measures of functional diversity: species richness, functional group richness, functional attribute diversity, and FD. The secondary goal is to showcase the novel methods required for calculating functional attribute diversity and FD. We find that species richness and functional group richness explain the least variation in aboveground biomass production within and across grassland biodiversity manipulations at six European locations; functional attribute diversity and FD explain greater variation. Reasons for differences in explanatory power are discussed, such as the relatively greater amount of information and fewer assumptions included in functional attribute diversity and FD. We explore the opportunities and limitations of the particular methods we used to calculate functional attribute diversity and FD. These mainly concern how best to select the information used to calculate them.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Forest Management and Policy
参考文献 50
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 475
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条