Artificial Intelligence in Nursing: Applications, Benefits, Challenges, and Implications — A Scoping Review
Asaf Shah, Hussain Ullah
University of Ulster
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Aim To map and synthesize evidence on the applications, benefits, challenges, and implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing practice, education, administration, and research. Design A scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and reported in line with PRISMA-ScR. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ypma2). Methods Seven databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library) and grey literature sources were searched for English-language studies published between January 2015 and February 2025. Two reviewers independently screened and charted data. Extracted information included study characteristics, AI type, nursing domain, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators. Results Twenty-eight studies were included, spanning 12 countries. Thematic mapping identified four domains: clinical practice (n = 12), education (n = 8), administration (n = 4), and research (n = 4). Benefits included improved patient safety, early detection of deterioration, personalized learning, efficiency in workforce management, and insights from nursing documentation. Barriers involved alarm fatigue, high costs, lack of AI literacy, and concerns about fairness, privacy, and professional autonomy. Facilitators included leadership support, training, integration into existing systems, and demonstrated patient-safety benefits. Conclusion AI in nursing is an expanding field with promising applications but remains limited by ethical, technical, and organizational challenges. Evidence is largely exploratory and outcome-focused evaluations are scarce. Impact Nurses, educators, and leaders must engage in co-design, training, and governance to ensure AI augments rather than undermines nursing values. Policymakers should embed equity, transparency, and accountability into AI integration strategies.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Advanced Technologies in Various Fields · Healthcare Systems and Public Health
参考文献 0
引用本文 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条