Leveraging a New Base Belief Function for Conflict Data Management and Decision Support
Palash Dutta, Sonom Shome
Dibrugarh University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
<title>Abstract</title> The Dempster-Shafer theory (D-S theory) finds wide-ranging applications, including pattern recognition and decision making. When paradoxes exists in multi-source information system due to unfavorable environment, unification cannot be reliably and effectively performed by traditional D-S theory. In light of this, a fresh perspective is taken to construct a base belief function for conflict data fusion within the D-S theory. In this novel approach, a new base belief function is introduced to modify the original basic probability assignment (BPA) prior to applying the classical Dempster combination rule (DCR) in a closed world scenario. Instead of assigning initial belief to the entire power set of the Frame of Discernment(FOD), the proposed method assigns base belief to individual events. This targeted approach aims to reduce the existing uncertainty within the FOD. To generate more intuitive outcomes, the proposed method combines the base belief function with the original BPA, thus incorporating all the pertinent information contained in the evidence set (BOE). Compared to other alternative methods, the proposed approach demonstrates consistent and logical outcomes that align with the real world. Furthermore, it exhibits a high rate of convergence and lower computational complexity. An advantageous aspect of the proposed method is its utilization of maximum information from the evidence set, not limited to an average operation between the base belief function and the initial BPA. This comprehensive integration not only resolves conflicts within the evidence set but also generates effective outcomes. To validate the efficaciousness of the proposed method, several numerical examples are presented, along with its application to classification problems. These instances substantiate the effectiveness of the approach in practice.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Risk and Safety Analysis
参考文献 63
此处列出前 3 条