Fracture and fatigue crack growth analysis of rail steels
Heshmat A Aglan, Mahmood Fateh
Tuskegee University Federal Railroad Administration
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Low carbon baintic steel shows promising potential, especially in critical components such as frogs and switches.Microstructural analysis of J6 bainitic rail steel was performed and compared with the microstructure of premium pearlitic rail steel.The bainitic microstructure revealed a mixture of tempered martensite and ferrite associated with intralath carbides.Typical pearlitic microstructure with a fine lamellar aggregate of very soft and ductile ferrite and very hard carbide cementite was observed.The mechanical properties, plane stress fracture toughness, K I c , and the fatigue crack growth behavior of the two steels were evaluated.Test specimens were machined from railheads of each material using electrical discharge machining (EDM).Rectangular unnotched and notched specimens were used for the mechanical properties and fatigue evaluation respectively.1/2T compact tension specimens were used for the K I c evaluation according to ASTM E399.The J6 bainitic steel has ultimate strength, yield strength, and elongation to failure of about 1500 MPa, 1100 MPa, and 13% respectively.These values are higher than those for pearlitic steel.It was found that the average K I c for the bainitic rail steel is 52 MPa √ m, while that of the premium pearlitic steel is 41 MPa √ m.Fatigue studies showed that the crack speed for the bainitic steel is lower than that for the pearlitic steel over the entire range of the energy release rate.The bainitic steel exhibits a higher rate of crack deceleration in the second stage, as indicated by the lower slope of the fatigue crack propagation kinetics curve in comparison with the pearlitic steel.This attests to the superior fatigue damage tolerance of the bainitic rail steel and provides evidence to support the superior rolling fatigue damage tolerance of the bainitic rail steel reported in the literature.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Fatigue and fracture mechanics
High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
参考文献 18
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 46
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条