Safety Assessment of Probiotics and Postbiotics: A Critical Review
Samira Ranjbar, Reza Ghotaslou, Khudaverdi Ganbarov, Şükran Köse, Amin Abbasi, Hossein Samadi Kafil
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Baku State University Dokuz Eylül University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Probiotics and postbiotics are essential components of modern dietary supplements, recognized for their beneficial effects on human health. While probiotics positively influence gut microbiota, digestion, and immune responses, their safety remains a concern, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, due to risks such as infections, transfer of antibiotic resistance genes, and systemic complications. In contrast, postbiotics-defined as inanimate microorganisms and/or their cellular components-offer a safer alternative by providing similar health benefits without the risks associated with live microorganisms. However, safety assessments of postbiotics remain limited and must address critical issues such as cytotoxicity, impurity profiles, and dose-response uncertainties, which are currently underexplored in the literature. Their enhanced stability under various environmental conditions further supports their application in inhibiting foodborne pathogens and extending product shelf life. This review critically evaluates the safety profiles of probiotics and postbiotics, offering a balanced analysis of their benefits and limitations, with particular attention to emerging safety concerns, risk assessment criteria, and applications in food safety and human health. Despite their promising safety profile, widespread adoption of postbiotics is hindered by the absence of standardized safety protocols and long-term toxicological data. Future research should therefore prioritize establishing evidence-based safety criteria, optimizing dosage and formulation for both probiotics and postbiotics, and addressing existing knowledge gaps through rigorous, targeted clinical studies, especially in vulnerable populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Scopus databases covering the period from 2000 to 2025.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety · Agricultural safety and regulations
参考文献 0
引用本文 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条