Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools
Anne L. Schneider, Helen Ingram
Arizona State University University of Arizona
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This paper provides a framework to analyze the implicit or explicit behavioral theories found in laws, regulations, and programs. The analysis focuses on policy tools or instruments and the underlying behavioral assumptions that guide their choice. We begin with the premise that public policy almost always attempts to get people to do things they otherwise would not have done, or it enables them to do things they might not have done otherwise. Policy tools are used to overcome impediments to policy-relevant actions. The five broad categories of tools we identify--authority, incentives, capacity-building, symbolic and hortatory, and learning--make different assumptions about how policy relevant behavior can be fostered. We contend that policy tools are essentially political phenomena, and that policy participation in the form of compliance, utilization, and other forms of "coproduction" is an important form of political behavior deserving of greater attention by political science.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Public Policy and Administration Research
参考文献 52
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 875
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条