Do Rewards Encourage Professional Skepticism? It Depends
Joseph F. Brazel, Justin Leiby, Tammie J. Schaefer
North Carolina State University University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign University of Missouri–Kansas City
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
In three experiments, we find that rewarding professional skepticism can backfire and decrease skepticism on future audit tasks where red flags are present. We focus on rewards for costly skepticism: skepticism that is ex ante appropriate, but generates incremental ex post costs and does not identify a misstatement. Auditors interpret a reward for costly skepticism as a better-than-expected outcome and view subsequent tasks from a risk-averse gain frame. As a result, auditors seek to avoid the downside risk of skeptical action, which decreases auditors' sensitivity to red flags and their willingness to communicate severe red flags to their managers, compromising audit quality. However, we also find that a supervisor consistently rewarding costly skepticism decreases auditors' risk aversion and increases their skepticism. In sum, auditors believe skeptical action has downside risk. A cultural shift toward credible, consistent rewards for appropriate skepticism likely helps ensure that rewards have their intended effect. Data Availability: Contact the authors.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Corruption and Economic Development
参考文献 47
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 43
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条