From Digital Literacy to AI Literacy: Developing a Comprehensive Framework for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Maria Ranieri, Gabriele Biagini, Stefano Cuomo
University of Florence
内容与影响
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates various sectors, existing digital literacy frameworks prove insufficient for addressing the unique challenges posed by autonomous, data-driven AI systems. This study aims to develop a comprehensive AI literacy framework that extends traditional digital literacy models to encompass the competencies required for effective and ethical engagement with AI technologies. Through a multi-phase research process conducted between 2022 and 2025, we employed two scoping reviews and one systematic literature review. The first phase analysed 35 articles on AI literacy conceptualization, the second examined 12 studies on AI literacy assessment tools, and the third systematically reviewed 87 studies from an initial pool of 323 records across major databases including Web of Science, SCOPUS, ERIC, and IEEE Xplore. Building on Calvani et al. (2009) digital literacy framework, we propose an AI literacy framework with four interconnected dimensions: cognitive (understanding AI concepts and mechanisms), operational (practical skills for AI interaction and application), critical (evaluating AI-generated content and societal impacts), and ethical (navigating moral implications and responsible AI use). The framework addresses key gaps in how AI literacy is conceptualized, moving beyond tool-based competencies to include understanding of autonomous systems. The transition from digital to AI literacy represents a paradigm shift requiring new competencies for educational, professional, and societal contexts. The framework provides a foundation for curriculum development, assessment design, and policy formulation to ensure individuals can critically engage with AI technologies while addressing their ethical and social implications.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Teaching and Learning Programming
参考文献 19
此处列出前 3 条