Special education teacher candidates’ experiences and views regarding artificial intelligence use
Mustafa Şat, Yusuf İrşad Başaran, Esmehan Özer
Korean Council for University Education Fatih Sultan Mehmet Waqf University Gazi University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The growing integration of AI in educational environments underscores the need to equip future educators to use AI ethically and pedagogically. This necessity is particularly evident in special education, where personalized instruction, professional expertise, and ethical awareness are essential. This qualitative study utilized a phenomenological research approach to document participants’ lived experiences. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with eight pre-service special education teachers who were actively engaged in school-based experiences throughout the inquiry. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to content analysis, facilitating the systematic identification of themes and subthemes. The study produced ten primary themes and twenty-five secondary themes. Results suggest that participants predominantly viewed AI as a pragmatic and beneficial resource, especially for time efficiency, the creation of instructional materials, and the accommodation of diverse learner needs. Artificial intelligence was perceived as possessing significant potential to enhance personalized learning and instructional planning within special education settings. Participants reported a lack of formal instruction in AI within their teacher education programs, stating that their understanding was largely derived from self-directed inquiry. Ethical concerns, particularly regarding data privacy, the accuracy of AI-generated information, and professional accountability, emerged as a significant subject. Participants underscored that AI should be viewed as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement for educators’ professional competence and interpersonal engagement. The findings underscore the imperative of integrating structured AI literacy, ethical awareness, and practical applications into special education teacher training programs to facilitate responsible and effective AI use.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Teaching and Learning Programming