Impact of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) on Middle School Students’ Writing Outcomes
Joshua Wilson, Corey Palermo, Matthew C. Myers, Tania Cruz Cordero, Halley Eacker, Andrew Potter, Jessica Coles, Henry May 等 9 位
University of Delaware Wested
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study used a randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of the automated writing evaluation system MI Write on middle school students from traditionally underserved groups, including Black and Hispanic/Latinx students and those experiencing poverty. The research focused on whether students who used MI Write for one school year (n = 1,260) showed improved argumentative writing performance, increased self-efficacy, greater enjoyment of writing, and stronger beliefs in the recursive nature of writing compared with those who did not use MI Write (n = 1,227) . No significant overall treatment effects were found, but significant treatment by district interactions emerged. Perceptions of MI Write were positive overall but varied by district. Findings reveal the limitations and promise of automated writing evaluation.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Writing and Handwriting Education
Mental Health via Writing · Reading and Literacy Development
参考文献 39
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 3
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条