Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications
John D. Bransford, Daniel L. Schwartz
Vanderbilt University
内容与影响
A belief in transfer lies at the heart of our educational system. Most educators want learning activities to have positive effects that extend beyond the exact conditions of initial learning. They are hopeful that students will show evidence of transfer in a variety of situations: from one problem to another within a course, from one course to another, from one school year to the next, and from their years in school to their years in the workplace. Beliefs about transfer often accompany the claim that it is better to ' 'educate' ' people broadly than simply to "train " them to perform particular tasks (e.g., Broudy, 1977). In this chapter, we discuss research on transfer from both a retrospective and a prospective perspective. What has past transfer research taught us that is especially important for education? What might research on transfer look like in the future? Our discussion of past research is brief, not because it is unimportant but because of space limitations and the fact that our primary emphasis is on the future. We argue that prevailing theories and methods of measuring transfer are limited in scope; we propose an alternative that complements and extends current approaches; and we sketch this alternative's implications for education. Our discussion is organized into five sections. First, we briefly summarize some of the key findings from the literature on transfer—both the successes and the disappointments. Second, we contrast the "traditional " view of transfer with an alternative that emphasizes the ability to learn during transfer. Third, we discuss mechanisms for transfer that emphasize Broudy's analysis of "knowing with " (which he adds to the more familiar replicative "knowing that " and applicative "knowing how"). Fourth, we show how our alternate view of transfer affects assumptions about what is valuable for students to learn. Finally, we show Funding for studies described in this chapter was provided by grants from the Office of Educational
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Taxation and Legal Issues
参考文献 107
此处列出前 3 条
施引文献 881
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条