Lithium extraction from hard rock lithium ores (spodumene, lepidolite, zinnwaldite, petalite): Technology, resources, environment and cost
Gao Tian-ming, Na Fan, Wu Chen, Dai Tao
China Geological Survey Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences University of Southern Denmark
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This paper focuses on the research progress of extracting lithium from spodumene, lepidolite, petalite and zinnwaldite by acid, alkali, salt roasting and chlorination methods, and analyzes the resource intensity, environmental impact and production cost of industrial lithium extraction from spodumene and lepidolite. It is found that sulfuric acid method has high lithium recovery rate, but with complicated process and high energy consumption; Alkali and chlorination methods can directly react with lithium ores, reducing energy consumption, but need to optimize reaction conditions and safety of equipment and operation; Salt roasting method has large material flux and high energy consumption, so require adjustment of sulfate ratio to increase the lithium yield and reduce production cost. Compared with extracting lithium from brine, extracting lithium from ores, calcination, roasting, purity and other processes consume more resources and energy; and its environmental impact mainly comes from the pollutants discharged by fossil energy, 9.3~60.4 times that of lithium extracted from brine. The processing cost of lithium extraction from lepidolite by sulfate roasting method is higher than that from spodumene by sulfuric acid due to the consumption of high value sulfate.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Extraction and Separation Processes
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
参考文献 58
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 212
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条