Reliability and validity of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International after hip fracture in patients aged ≥65 years
Jan Visschedijk, Caroline B. Terwee, Monique A. A. Caljouw, Monica Spruit‐van Eijk, Romke van Balen, Wilco P. Achterberg
Leiden University Leiden University Medical Center Zorggroep Solis Amsterdam Public Health
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
PURPOSE: To assess the measurement properties of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) in patients after a hip fracture aged ≥ 65 years. METHODS: In a sample of 100 patients, we examined the structural validity, internal consistency and construct validity. For the structural validity a confirmatory factor analysis was carried out. For construct validity predetermined hypotheses were tested. In a second sample of 21 older patients the inter-rater reliability was evaluated. RESULTS: The factor analysis yielded strong evidence that the FES-I is uni-dimensional in patients with a hip fracture; the Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. When testing the reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.72, while the Standard Error of Measurement was 6.4 and the Smallest Detectable Change was 17.7 (on a scale from 16 to 64). The Spearman correlation of the FES-I with the one-item fear of falling instrument was high (r = 0.68). The correlation was moderate with instruments measuring functional performance constructs and low with instruments measuring psychological constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability and structural validity of the FES-I in patients after a hip fracture are good. The construct validity appears more closely related to functional performance constructs than to psychological constructs, suggesting that the concept measured by the FES-I may not capture all aspects of fear of falling. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), which is commonly used to measure fear of falling in community-dwelling older persons, can also be used to assess fear of falling in patients after a hip fracture. The reliability and the structural validity of the FES-I for these hip patients are good, whereas the construct validity of the FES-I is not optimal. The FES-I may not capture all aspects of fear of falling and may be more closely related to functional performance than to psychological concepts such as anxiety.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Hip and Femur Fractures · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
参考文献 51
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 51
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条