Dances, Duets, and Debates: Analysing political communication and viewer engagement on TikTok
Natalia Umansky, Christian Pipal
Schiller International University University of Zurich Faculty of Media
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Launched in 2017, TikTok has rapidly gained global popularity, extending beyond entertainment to become a hub for ideological formation and political activism, revolutionizing the way politicians interact with constituents. Yet, despite extensive research on politicians’ use of social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook, TikTok’s distinct platform-specific languages and features have received limited attention. Its short video clips, algorithmic content recommendations, and mobile-first interface present new challenges and opportunities for politicians aiming to communicate effectively with society. This paper addresses this gap by providing a first examination of the ways in which U.S. politicians embrace and adapt to the TikTok platform. Employing a multimodal approach that studies video, text, and audio, we collect and analyse a novel dataset of TikTok videos created by U.S. Governors and Members of Congress to understand how they use comedic, documentary, communal, explanatory, interactive, and meta communication styles to connect with their audience. Our analyses reveal that U.S. politicians primarily use TikTok as a platform to communicate about political issues, often adopting explanatory and documentary styles to articulate their policies. However, the comedic style significantly boosts engagement, especially for female politicians, who see a fourfold increase in engagement when producing comedic content compared to male counterparts. This presents a challenge for politicians: balancing humor's allure with the seriousness expected from them. Our findings provide valuable insights into digital political communication on emerging platforms like TikTok and the role of multiple message modalities in harnessing online attention and engagement.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Misinformation and Its Impacts
Social Media and Politics · Media Influence and Health
参考文献 56
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 11
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条