Artificial Intelligence as a Psychotherapeutic Tool: Competency Delegation, Ethical Boundaries, and the Irreducible Human Element
Élison Silva Santos
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into psychological practice has introduced new opportunities for assessment, intervention, and decision support, while simultaneously raising critical ethical and professional concerns. This paper examines the role of AI as a psychotherapeutic tool through the lens of competency delegation, arguing that the responsible integration of AI in psychotherapy depends on clearly delineating which psychological functions can be ethically automated and which remain irreducibly human. Drawing on contemporary research in AI-assisted mental health interventions, clinical decision-support systems, and psychological assessment, the paper identifies domains in which AI can enhance efficiency, scalability, and personalization, such as data-driven assessment, psychoeducation, and structured interventions.At the same time, it critically analyzes the limits of AI in psychotherapy, emphasizing the centrality of the therapeutic alliance, embodied empathy, and relational dynamics as core elements that cannot be replicated by non-conscious systems. The paper argues that while AI may simulate aspects of interpersonal interaction, it lacks the capacity for genuine emotional presence, co-regulation, and intersubjective engagement. These limitations establish clear ethical boundaries for the delegation of psychological competencies.Building on this analysis, the study proposes a framework for ethical integration grounded in principles of human oversight, transparency, fairness, and alignment with human values. It highlights the role of professional organizations in establishing guidelines for competency delegation, certification of AI tools, and the promotion of digital literacy among psychologists. Ultimately, the paper advances a model of human–AI collaboration in psychotherapy that preserves the irreducible human elements of care while leveraging technological innovation to expand access and enhance clinical practice.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Digital Mental Health Interventions
Mental Health via Writing · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education