Financial Risk Measurement for Financial Risk Management
Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Peter Christoffersen, Francis X. Diebold
Northwestern University National Bureau of Economic Research Aarhus University Duke University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Current practice largely follows restrictive approaches to market risk measurement, such as historical simulation or RiskMetrics.In contrast, we propose flexible methods that exploit recent developments in financial econometrics and are likely to produce more accurate risk assessments, treating both portfolio-level and asset-level analysis.Asset-level analysis is particularly challenging because the demands of real-world risk management in financial institutions -in particular, real-time risk tracking in very high-dimensional situations -impose strict limits on model complexity.Hence we stress powerful yet parsimonious models that are easily estimated.In addition, we emphasize the need for deeper understanding of the links between market risk and macroeconomic fundamentals, focusing primarily on links among equity return volatilities, real growth, and real growth volatilities.Throughout, we strive not only to deepen our scientific understanding of market risk, but also cross-fertilize the academic and practitioner communities, promoting improved market risk measurement technologies that draw on the best of both.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Market Dynamics and Volatility · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
参考文献 236
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 43
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条