Fintech, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Rise of Shadow Banks
Greg Buchak, Gregor Matvos, Tomasz Piskorski, Amit Seru
National Bureau of Economic Research Baruch College University of Chicago Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Shadow bank market share in residential mortgage origination nearly doubled from 2007-2015, with particularly dramatic growth among online "fintech" lenders.We study how two forces, regulatory differences and technological advantages, contributed to this growth.Difference in difference tests exploiting geographical heterogeneity induced by four specific increases in regulatory burden-capital requirements, mortgage servicing rights, mortgage-related lawsuits, and the movement of supervision to Office of Comptroller and Currency following closure of the Office of Thrift Supervision--all reveal that traditional banks contracted in markets where they faced more regulatory constraints; shadow banks partially filled these gaps.Fintech lenders appear to offer a higher quality product and charge a premium of 14-16 basis points.Relative to other lenders, they seem to use different information to set interest rates.A quantitative model of mortgage lending suggests that regulation accounts for roughly 60% of shadow bank growth, while technology accounts for roughly 30%.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency · Housing Market and Economics
参考文献 29
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 256
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条