Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Prediction versus Judgment
Ajay Agrawal, Joshua S. Gans, Avi Goldfarb
National Bureau of Economic Research University of Toronto
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Based on recent developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), we examine what type of human labor will be a substitute versus a complement to emerging technologies.We argue that these recent developments reduce the costs of providing a particular set of tasks -prediction tasks.Prediction about uncertain states of the world is an input into decision-making.We show that prediction allows riskier decisions to be taken and this is its impact on observed productivity although it could also increase the variance of outcomes as well.We consider the role of human judgment in decision-making as prediction technology improves.Judgment is exercised when the objective function for a particular set of decisions cannot be described (i.e., coded).However, we demonstrate that better prediction impacts the returns to different types of judgment in opposite ways.Hence, not all human judgment will be a complement to AI.Finally, we show that humans will delegate some decisions to machines even when the decision would be superior with human input.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIForecasting Techniques and Applications
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
参考文献 11
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 64
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条