How Do Top Acquirers Compare in Technology Mergers? New Evidence from an S&P Taxonomy
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Liad Wagman
National Bureau of Economic Research Illinois Institute of Technology University of Maryland, College Park
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Some argue that large platforms, such as Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Microsoft (or GAFAM), are unusual in their number, pace and concentration of technology mergers, with the potential to harm market competition.Using a unique taxonomy developed by S&P Global Market Intelligence, we compare the M&A activities of GAFAM to other top acquirers from 2010 to 2020.We find: (i) GAFAM completed more tech acquisitions per firm than other groups of top acquirers, and acquired younger and more consumer-facing firms on average.(ii) The top 25 private equity firms outpaced GAFAM in tech acquisitions per firm since 2018.(iii) GAFAM acquisitions are less concentrated across tech categories than other top acquirer groups, due, in part, to an "acquire-adjacent-and-then-expand" strategy.(iv) Over time, more and more GAFAM and other top acquirers acquire in the same categories.(v)No evidence suggesting that a GAFAM acquisition in a category, compared to similar categories without GAFAM acquisitions, is correlated with a slowdown in the number of new acquirers acquiring in that category.Overall, we find that technology acquisitions do not shield GAFAM from competition, at least not from other GAFAM members or other firms that acquire in the same categories.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Merger and Competition Analysis
Corporate Finance and Governance · Digital Platforms and Economics