Traditional herbal medicine for anorexia in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Su Bin Park, Jee-Hyun Yoon, Eun Hye Kim, Hayun Jin, Seong Woo Yoon
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong Kyung Hee University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Background: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional herbal medicine (THM) for improving anorexia in patients with cancer. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated orally administered THM for cancer-related anorexia using 10 databases from the inception to 1 August 2021. The primary outcome was an improvement in anorexia, measured with the total effective rate (TER) or visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the changes in body weight, the Karnofsky performance scale, acylated ghrelin, and adverse events. We used the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method to assess the quality of the studies and the quality of the evidence. Results: A total of 26 RCTs were included, of which 23 were subjected to quantitative analysis. THM showed a significant improvement in anorexia measured with the TER [risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.04–1.20] than appetite stimulants with moderate quality evidence and in the Karnofsky performance scale (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12–1.70) with low quality evidence but not in body weight gain (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80–1.20). THM showed a significant improvement in anorexia measured with the TER (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.23–2.48) compared with usual care with low-quality evidence but did not significantly improve the VAS score (mean difference 0.72, 95% CI 0.00–1.43) or the level of acylated ghrelin (mean difference 0.94, 95% CI 1.08–2.97). There were no serious adverse events. Conclusion: This review suggests that THM may be considered a safe alternative therapeutic option for improving anorexia in patients with cancer. Nonetheless, more rigorous RCTs are needed due to methodological limitations. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero , identifier CRD42021276508.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Medical Research and Treatments · Nutrition and Health in Aging
参考文献 48
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 4
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条