A Cascading Delphi Method-Based FMEA Risk Assessment Framework for Surgical Instrument Design: A Case Study of a Fetoscope
Wipharat Phokee, Sunisa Chaiklieng, Pornpimon Boriwan, Thanathorn Phoka, Jeroen AJ Vanoirbeek, Surapong Chatpun
Prince of Songkla University Khon Kaen University Naresuan University KU Leuven
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is crucial for identifying risk reduction opportunities in design. This study aims to aid in the design of sophisticated medical devices by setting guidelines and addressing weaknesses in data collection and risk priority numbers (RPNs). This is achieved by developing an FMEA framework with potential efficiency and efficacy benefits for design engineers, surgeons and patients. The FMEA framework covered risk analysis and risk evaluation by integrating a cascading Delphi method to address data collection and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) technique to address RPN calculations. This study involved the design of a flexible fetoscope for minimally invasive fetal intervention, analyzing and evaluating risks. The cascading FMEA framework had two stages for data collection, namely risk identification by individual interview and risk evaluation by individual email. The cascading Delphi FMEA framework with MCDM identified the potential risks for the mother at the tip (risk score = 0.927) and subsequent risks such as debris loss (risk score = 0.896), material degradation (risk score = 0.896), and glue dislodging (risk score = 0.896) as critical issues. By identifying failure modes early, medical device designers can better mitigate risks during the initial design stages.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Delphi Technique in Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
参考文献 36
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 3
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条