Investigation of the Influence of Including or Omitting the Oxide Layer on the Result of Identifying the Local Boundary Condition during Water Spray Cooling
Agnieszka Cebo-Rudnicka, B. Hadała
Jagiellonian University AGH University of Krakow
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
In the case of products made of steel, the presence of an oxide layer, which is formed during the steel production process as a result of high temperature, has a significant impact on the process of heat removal from the surface of the cooled material. For this reason, it is necessary to take into account the presence of the oxide layer in mathematical and numerical models used to simulate the distribution of the temperature field in cooled steel products. These models are based on the boundary conditions identified for given production conditions. This paper presents a comparison of the results of the identification of the boundary condition during water spray cooling of Armco iron with the use of the inverse solution. Numerical calculations were carried out using two models of heat conduction. In the first model, the presence of an oxide layer with different thermophysical properties than the base material (Armco iron) was taken into account. The second model assumed no oxide layer on the cooled Armco iron surface. It was found that the inverse solution obtained in the case of the heat conduction model taking into account the thickness of the oxide layer is correct in time and as a function of temperature. Thus, the boundary condition model obtained as a function of temperature is universal. However, this model requires an additional layer of oxides with different thermophysical properties than the base material to be included in the finite element model (FEM). Based on the conducted uncertainty tests of the inverse solution, it was found that the results of the determined boundary condition in the absence of the oxide layer on the cooled surface are subject to an error higher than 10% in comparison to the maximum reference value of the heat transfer coefficient.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
参考文献 28
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条