Different Pathways of Skin Aging: Objective Instrumental Evaluation
Noah Musolff, Carmen Cantisani, Stefania Guida, Simone Michelini, Madeline Tchack, Babar K Rao, Giovanni Pellacani
Sapienza University of Rome Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Rutgers Health
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Background/Objectives: Hypertrophic and atrophic skin aging represent two distinct phenotypes: hypertrophic aging is marked by deep wrinkles and a leathery texture, whereas atrophic aging is characterized by overall skin thinning, increased vascularity, and a higher risk of non-melanoma skin cancers. This study aims to elucidate the characteristics and differences between hypertrophic and atrophic facial aging subtypes using two non-invasive imaging devices: VISIA® and dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who had presented to the outpatient dermatological clinic at Policlinico Umberto I hospital in Rome, Italy for a non-invasive facial imaging check-up. We included 40 patients aged 60–75 who were imaged with VISIA® and dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT). Based on the number of UV spots and amount of red found on VISIA®, subjects were grouped into four subgroups (PIGM, RED, CONTROL, PIGM + RED), and trends among them were analyzed. Results: We found a strong correlation between VISIA® red area scores and D-OCT vascular density at 300 µm depth, confirming VISIA®’s effectiveness for assessing facial vascularity. Wrinkle count was highest in areas with UV spots, particularly in the PIGM and PIGM + RED groups. Conversely, low attenuation coefficients and dermal density were observed in regions with low UV spots but high red areas. Intermediate subgroups (CONTROL and PIGM + RED) displayed varying parameters. Conclusions: Non-invasive imaging devices are effective in evaluating facial aging and distinguishing between aging subtypes. This study identified two intermediate aging types in addition to the hypertrophic and atrophic subtypes.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Skin Protection and Aging
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques · Dermatologic Treatments and Research
参考文献 30
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 5
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条