A Generative AI Framework for Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults: An Integrated Engineering Design and Clinical Protocol
Taeksoo Jeong, Geonhwi Hwang, Doo Young Kim
Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital Catholic Kwandong University Hokkaido University
内容与影响
Background: Digital exclusion is a validated risk factor for cognitive decline in older adults. Digital interventions exhibit high dropout rates due to low digital literacy, technology anxiety, and limited adaptation to individual states, resulting in limited real-world transfer. Objective: This protocol aims to present the CTC Framework (Coach–Teacher–Companion), a tri-agent generative AI system proposed for exploring the feasibility of adaptive cognitive interventions in older adults with existing digital access. The protocol provides technical architecture, feasibility-stage implementation procedures, and methodological and ethical guidelines to assist clinicians in safely applying AI-based cognitive interventions in clinical research settings. Methods: The framework integrates three AI agents (Coach, Teacher, and Companion) designed to provide behavioral, cognitive, and emotional support. The system is designed to embed cognitive exercises in daily activities, monitor emotional states, and incorporate accessibility features for age-related limitations. Implementation safeguards include digital literacy assessment (MDPQ-16), technology anxiety monitoring (CARS), emotional safety protocols, and data privacy protections. The protocol specifies a six-week feasibility study (n=14, MMSE 18–25) to evaluate usability (System Usability Scale, primary outcome), user experience (UEQ-S), psychological needs satisfaction (BPNS), emotional safety (PANAS), adherence, and preliminary cognitive outcomes (MMSE, TMT-A/B, Digit Span). Conclusions: The CTC Framework is designed to provide methodological and ethical safeguards for clinical implementation, including standardized procedures for digital literacy assessment, technology anxiety management, emotional safety monitoring, and data privacy protections. Empirical validation of the framework’s feasibility and efficacy is required through future studies.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Technology Use by Older Adults
Digital Mental Health Interventions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
参考文献 89
此处列出前 3 条
施引文献 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条