Validity and Reliability of the Inertial Measurement Unit for Barbell Velocity Assessments: A Systematic Review
Filipe Manuel Clemente, Zeki Akyıldız, José Pino‐Ortega, Markel Rico-González
Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo Instituto de Telecomunicações Gazi University Universidad de Murcia
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The use of inertial measurement unit (IMU) has become popular in sports assessment. In the case of velocity-based training (VBT), there is a need to measure barbell velocity in each repetition. The use of IMUs may make the monitoring process easier; however, its validity and reliability should be established. Thus, this systematic review aimed to (1) identify and summarize studies that have examined the validity of wearable wireless IMUs for measuring barbell velocity and (2) identify and summarize studies that have examined the reliability of IMUs for measuring barbell velocity. A systematic review of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. From the 161 studies initially identified, 22 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Among the eight different IMU models, seven can be considered valid and reliable for measuring barbell velocity. The great majority of IMUs used for measuring barbell velocity in linear trajectories are valid and reliable, and thus can be used by coaches for external load monitoring.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Sports Performance and Training
Sports injuries and prevention · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
参考文献 70
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 56
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条