Comparison of Different Extraction Techniques and Conditions for Optimizing an HPLC-DAD Method for the Routine Determination of the Content of Chlorogenic Acids in Green Coffee Beans
Mohammed D. Y. Oteef
Jazan University
内容与影响
Chlorogenic acids (CGAs) are the main phenolic compounds found in green coffee beans. They are receiving more attention recently due to the proven health and nutrition benefits they offer, in addition to their role as markers for coffee quality. A relatively large number of studies are reported in the literature that are based on the analysis of these compounds. However, very limited research is dedicated to the evaluation of the performance of the analytical methods used, particularly the extraction procedures. Therefore, this work was dedicated to the comparison of different extraction techniques and conditions in order to evaluate their influence on the measured content of the three main CGAs in green coffee beans, namely, chlorogenic acid (5-CQA), neochlorogenic acid (3-CQA) and cryptochlorogenic acid (4-CQA). Five simple extraction techniques with affordable equipment were compared in order to develop a routine method suitable for most analytical and food analysis laboratories. The compared extraction techniques provided relatively similar extraction efficiency for the three compounds. However, due to the merits of ultrasonic-assisted extraction as a fast, effective, green, and economical technique, this was selected for comparing the extraction variables and developing an optimized routine method. The extraction solvent, temperature, time, solid-to-solvent ratio, and grinding treatments were the variables that were investigated. The extraction solvent and the solid-to-solvent ratio were found to be the most influencing variables that may improve the extraction efficiency to up to 50%. Based on this thorough investigation, an optimized method for the routine determination of the content of chlorogenic acids in green coffee beans was developed. The developed method is simple, fast, and efficient in the extraction of the three main CGAs.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Coffee research and impacts
Tea Polyphenols and Effects · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
参考文献 87
此处列出前 3 条
施引文献 23
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条