Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy
Barbara S. Romzek, Melvin J. Dubnick
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This chapter offers an alternative explanation which addresses institutional factors contributing to the shuttle accident. On January 28, 1986, the space shuttle Challenger exploded in mid-flight and seven crew members lost their lives. The chapter provides types of accountability systems: Bureaucratic accountability systems, legal accountability, professional accountability and political accountability. In the American political system, all four accountability types offer potentially legitimate means for managing institutional level expectations. Accountability is a fundamental but underdeveloped concept in American public administration. Scholars and practitioners freely use the term to refer to answerability for one's actions or behavior. Legal Accountability is similar to the bureaucratic form in that it involves the frequent application of control to a wide range of public administration activities. The professional accountability system was evident in the three centers under the Office of Manned Space Flight (OMSF): the Marshall Space Flight Center, the Manned Spacecraft Center, and Kennedy Space Center.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Public Policy and Administration Research
Public Administration and Governance · Administrative Law and Governance
参考文献 0
引用本文 118
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条