Reflective Pedagogies and the Metacognitive Turn in College Teaching
N. Clayton Silver
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Reflection and metacognition , the key terms of this book, have deeply intertwined histories in discourse on teaching and learning. In a general sense, interest in the two terms arises from the recognition that, in learning and in professional practice, content and procedural knowledge alone are insufficient for persistent and self-directed growth in a learner’s or practitioner’s understanding and expertise. Additionally, knowledge about how one learns content or practices a procedure is required. It is this attention to how that gives rise to the moment of reflexivity in reflection and the moment of meta in metacognition—that is, the moment of standing above or apart from oneself, so to speak, in order to turn one’s attention back upon one’s own mental work. In broad terms, then, reflection is often defined as a conscious exploration of one’s own experiences (see, for example, Boud, Keogh, & Walker, 1985 ), and metacognition as the act of thinking about one’s own thought processes (see Flavell, 1979 ). In the course of this chapter, I will aim to elaborate these initial definitions by placing them within the context of the educational trends and research out of which they developed, outline their connections to other important educational concepts, and overview the specific reflective and metacognitive pedagogical practices offered by the volume’s contributors.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Reflective Practices in Education
参考文献 0
引用本文 54
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条