Tiktok as a Political Communication Medium: An Examination of the United Nations
Zindan Çakıcı
Üsküdar University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
In contemporary society, TikTok has emerged as a preeminent platform increasingly used by political entities to facilitate the advancement of communication strategies and currently boasts over 1.1 billion active users. The United Nations (UN), established in 1945 as a quintessential international political institution, inaugurated an official TikTok account in 2020 in response to the exigencies imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic. An examination of the extant literature reveals a marked paucity of scholarly inquiries critically evaluating the UN's social media communication strategies, particularly a notable dearth of analyses specifically addressing the UN's strategic engagements on TikTok. This study aspires to augment the existing corpus of literature concerning TikTok's role in global communication by scrutinizing the UN's communication strategies on this platform. The research entails a content analysis of 287 posts disseminated via the UN's TikTok account from March 31, 2020, to October 26, 2024. The findings elucidate that the UN has adeptly constructed a digital communication strategy characterized by the extensive integration of elements, including subtitles, captions, music, and hashtag within its TikTok posts. Moreover, the analysis indicates that the UN endeavors to transmit salient messages to its audience through a diverse array of audiovisual formats and affective tonalities. However, it is also observed that the UN inadequately addresses the exigencies of marginalized populations on TikTok, manifesting disparities in representational equity for specific demographic cohorts and exhibiting insufficient adherence to the principle of multilingualism. Finally, the UN was found to have a clear bias in its TikTok content regarding global political issues, a stance evident in the framing of the content.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Educational Methods and Impacts
Digital Media and Philosophy · Social Media and Politics
参考文献 71
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 10
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条