Comparing Therapeutic Factors in Group CBT and Group Analytic Psychotherapy
Konstantinos P. Giannakopoulos, Christina Zourna, Georgios Pilafas
University of Derby
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The current study compared therapeutic factors (TFs) in Group CBT and Group Analytic Psychotherapy considering the duration of therapy (less than one year or more than one year). The individual scores on four global TFs, namely Instillation of Hope, Secure Emotional Expression, Awareness of Relational Impact and Social Learning were measured by deploying the TFI-19 questionnaire. The sample comprised n=180 members of Group Therapy settings. A 2x2 Factorial Independent Measures ANOVA was deployed to test the differences. Both type and duration of Group Therapy demonstrated a statistically significant effect on all four TFs, where members of Group Analytic settings and members with more than one year participation scored higher. However, the small effect size of Group therapy type on the TFs scores underlines that confounding variables and therapy-specific factors intervene. On the contrary, the medium effect size of the therapy duration on the TFs elucidates that increased curative outcomes are expected over time. No interaction effect was found between type and duration of group therapy. Further research should consider an alternative research design enabling the integration of the Common Factors theory and the Empirical Supported Treatment approach in a new TFs model. Key words: group therapy, therapeutic factors, group analysis, Group CBT, TFI-19
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Child Therapy and Development
参考文献 38
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条