Reception Aesthetics and the Challenges of Poetry Translation: A Systematic Literature Review
Yuqing Chen, Chwee Fang Ng, Zainor Izat Zainal
Universiti Putra Malaysia
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study uses a systematic literature review approach, primarily through the theoretical framework of reception aesthetics, to critically evaluate various translation strategies in poetry. The study’s main purpose is to examine the application of existing translation strategies, analyze the role of these strategies in aesthetic and cultural transfer, and identify how these strategies guide the target language readers’ participation in the translated text. To this end, this study reviewed 28 relevant articles and identified three research gaps: methodological gaps, knowledge gaps, and experience gaps. Results from this review illustrated that the framework of reception aesthetics, especially the key concepts such as “horizon of expectation,” “fusion of horizons,” and “appealing structure,” are not applied consistently in the existing literature, and most studies are limited, often examining only one or two concepts, lacking a holistic perspective. In addition, most studies fail to effectively include the participation of target readers, resulting in a lack of feedback and evaluation from target language readers; thus, it is not easy to apply the theory to the actual cultural transfer and aesthetic effects. The research also emphasized that studies combining theory and practice need to be further developed. These studies provide a theoretical frame of reference for future relevant research, highlighting what needs to be done to enhance and expand understanding of the artistic aspects of poetry translation and thus suggests ways in which theory and practice might better work together. At the same time, the study also provides new ideas and concrete implementation approaches for comprehensively improving the combination of theory and practice in poetry translation in the future.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Translation Studies and Practices
Comparative and World Literature · Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
参考文献 0
引用本文 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条