Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement, and recommendations
Alejandro Adler, Martin E. P. Seligman
California University of Pennsylvania
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Indicators of social progress are the primary drivers of public policy. If existing economic measures of prosperity are complemented with wellbeing metrics that better capture changes in individuals' quality of life, decision makers will be better informed to assess and design policy. The science of wellbeing has yielded extensive knowledge and measurement instruments during more than three decades. We review the existing wellbeing literature and answer three questions: (1) What is wellbeing? (2) How do we measure wellbeing? And, importantly, distinguishing this review from previous ones, (3) How do we use wellbeing metrics to assess and design policy? We suggest that the science of wellbeing is empirically mature enough to complement economic assessments of national progress. We build on existing work to provide recommendations on metrics and new, specific policies for societal wellbeing.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Health disparities and outcomes · Income, Poverty, and Inequality
参考文献 254
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 271
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条