Assessing Chat GPT's influence on English Academic writing Educational Prospects and Limitations
Ammar Aslam, Milad Salem Mohammed Ebshara, Unaiza Khudai, A Khan Javaid, Anum Fatima
Ghazi University Cyprus International University University of Technology Malaysia University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study examines the effect of AI-based language tool ChatGPT on English academic writing. The research investigates the advantages and challenges of its application in educational contexts, specifically the ability to improve writing skills, help to overcome difficulties faced by language learners and combat academic integrity and critical thinking issues. The research is quantitative in nature and data is collected through survey from 250 students in different Pakistani universities. To ensure the representativeness of the sample, a random sampling approach is used. The data is processed on SPSS-28, frequency and percentage are reported for demographic information, while chatGPT benefits and barriers and educational implications have been measure on 5-point Likert scale. The findings suggest that ChatGPT is a generally successful tool to enhance academic writing with respect to grammatics, organization, and vocabulary. Furthermore, the tool was reported to boost students’ confidence and to help in saving time in writing and editing academic text. But the research also raises fears over the overuse of AI tools, which could lead to a degradation of students’ cognitive abilities, and the risks of this being violated with academic integrity, e.g. plagiarism or not being supported in proper citation. This study adds to our understanding of the ongoing narrative about the use of AI tools in educational settings within the field of English academic writing. It provides practical advice for educators and policy makers on finding a trade-off between the advantages of AI supported learning and maintaining academic integrity and enabling learner autonomy. The results highlight the need for responsible AI use policies, and training for students and educators.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI in Service Interactions · Online Learning and Analytics
参考文献 0
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条