INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF GENERATIVE AI IN TRANSFORMING TEACHING, LEARNING,AND ASSESSMENT PRACTICES
Sidra Sohail, Shumaila Parveen, Than Dar
University of Lahore
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini into educational contexts has ushered in a paradigm shift in how teaching, learning, and assessment are designed and delivered. This study investigates the multifaceted role of GenAI in transforming educational practices, drawing insights from educators and learners across secondary and tertiary institutions. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research explores how GenAI supports instructional efficiency, personalized learning, and novel assessment formats, while also raising concerns regarding academic integrity, policy clarity, and digital equity. Quantitative survey data (n = 300) reveals that a significant portion of educators use GenAI for lesson planning, grading support, and content generation, reporting time savings and increased differentiation. Students report using GenAI for idea generation, language refinement, and exam preparation, citing increased confidence and comprehension. However, both groups express uncertainty about ethical boundaries and inconsistent institutional guidelines. Thematic analysis of interviews (n = 40) surfaces four core themes: empowerment through personalization, enhanced efficiency with caveats, ethical ambiguity, and the urgent need for AI literacy and policy development. This study contributes to the emerging literature on AI in education by offering a nuanced, data-driven understanding of the promises and perils of GenAI adoption. The findings emphasize the need for rethinking pedagogical design, assessment models, and institutional policies to ensure that GenAI is integrated responsibly, equitably, and effectively. The study concludes with actionable recommendations for educators, policymakers, and technology developers to co-create future-ready educational ecosystems that preserve human creativity, integrity, and critical thinking.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIArtificial Intelligence in Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Educational Technology and Pedagogy