Five Common Mistakes for Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in Management Research
Asyraf Afthanorhan, Zainudin Awang, Nazim Aimran
Sultan Zainal Abidin University Universiti Teknologi MARA System Universiti Teknologi MARA
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The value of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) in management research has now been acknowledged, although the PLS-PM was developed for a reason. First, the PLS-PM was developed as an alternative to Covariance based Structural Equation Modeling (CBSEM) when exploratory research is conducted. As far as this method concerned, many researchers are misused or overuse the application of PLS-PM without understanding the basic knowledge in structural equation modeling. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the five common mistakes (data distributions, sample size limitations, unsatisfactory fitness index, misunderstanding between confirmatory and exploratory research, and poor factor loadings) for using PLS-PM over CB-SEM in management research. We concluded that the researchers should respect these methods and justify their use when conducting the research projects because some of the projects might be better for CB-SEM or PLS-PM.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIPsychometric Methodologies and Testing
Business Strategies and Management Research · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models