Association between Conversational AI Usage and Depressive Symptoms among Young Adults in West Bengal: A Cross-sectional Study
Tanisa Ghosh, Swagata Sarkar, Ananya Ghosh, Puspen Ghosh, Avradeep Ganguly
Adamas University India Health Action Trust
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Background: Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) tools have become increasingly integrated into the daily lives of young adults for educational, emotional, and productivity-related purposes. Despite growing reliance on these technologies, their psychological impact on youth mental health remains insufficiently understood. Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between conversational AI usage and depressive symptom severity among young adults in West Bengal, India. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 231 young adults aged 18–25 years using convenience and snowball sampling methods. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Data regarding conversational AI usage frequency and usage purposes were also collected. Pearson correlation, simple linear regression, one-way ANOVA, and chi-square analyses were performed to evaluate associations between AI usage and depression severity. Results: The mean PHQ-9 score was 11.0 ± 5.78, indicating an overall moderate level of depressive symptoms among participants. ChatGPT was the most frequently used AI platform (71.86%). Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a weak negative association between AI usage frequency and PHQ-9 scores (r = −0.113, p = 0.086), which was not statistically significant. Regression analysis similarly showed that conversational AI usage did not significantly predict depression severity (R² = 0.013). No significant differences in depression scores were observed across AI usage groups in ANOVA or chi-square analyses. Conclusion: The findings suggest that conversational AI usage is not significantly associated with depressive symptom severity among young adults in West Bengal. While AI tools may support productivity and emotional engagement, they should not be considered substitutes for professional mental health care. Further longitudinal and qualitative research is needed to better understand the long-term psychological implications of AI-mediated interactions.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Digital Mental Health Interventions
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Mental Health via Writing